That’s a very good question, and to be honest I find it much easier to think about the benefits of them – many people die while waiting for a transplant organ to become free, and artificial organs can work around that. However, as with everything, there are drawbacks.
One problem may be battery life – I read about one type of artificial heart whose battery lasted 30 minutes, but could be charged through the skin by a battery pack in a vest. Those packs only lasted 4 hours though, so not ideal all in all. It’s also the case that surgery to remove a natural heart and insert an artificial one is an enormous undertaking – the trauma can mean the patients (many of whom are quite ill anyway) struggle to recover.
More common than full artificial hearts, it seems, are devices which help your heart to pump more powerfully. These are also large and bulky, but less traumatic to insert – more like working with your heart than replacing it. And for the future scientists are hoping to make 3d printed silicone artificial hearts – smaller, lighter and more like the real thing 🙂
I’ll add a comment on another possible problem: Lots of medical hardware – things like pacemakers or insulin pumps – have wireless connectivity enabled. This is important to make it easy to monitor what’s going on and possibly to alter treatment depending on what’s going on inside you – but it also introduces a massive vulnerability – unless the pacemaker is very cautious about security, and unless they issue security updates – your pacemaker can now be hacked. It’s a well known problem that security experts have been warning about recently. Too many medical devices aren’t updated regularly, and that’s part of the reason the WannaCry virus crippled the NHS recently. I’m not even sure if we learned our lessons from WannaCry! You can read more about medical device security (or lack thereof) here: https://www.ft.com/content/00989b9c-7634-11e7-90c0-90a9d1bc9691
Comments
yoyehudi commented on :
I’ll add a comment on another possible problem: Lots of medical hardware – things like pacemakers or insulin pumps – have wireless connectivity enabled. This is important to make it easy to monitor what’s going on and possibly to alter treatment depending on what’s going on inside you – but it also introduces a massive vulnerability – unless the pacemaker is very cautious about security, and unless they issue security updates – your pacemaker can now be hacked. It’s a well known problem that security experts have been warning about recently. Too many medical devices aren’t updated regularly, and that’s part of the reason the WannaCry virus crippled the NHS recently. I’m not even sure if we learned our lessons from WannaCry! You can read more about medical device security (or lack thereof) here: https://www.ft.com/content/00989b9c-7634-11e7-90c0-90a9d1bc9691
Oli commented on :
Wow, that’s amazing, Yo! That really does sound dangerous, and would bring a whole new meaning to the phrase ‘coming down with a virus’…